Some might say that the previous exhibit (page 19) is not really a geomagic square, because the target is non-existent. Nor will it help if the pieces are viewed as two dimensional, rather than as the 3-D objects they suggest. Scrutiny will show that piece outlines in targets often differ slightly from the outline of the same piece in its cell. Nevertheless, that a true geomagic square underlies the other is made evident here.